The table compares the proportion of residents living in four kinds of accommodation in the Central area, Green Park Area and Southberg Area. Overall, in Central areal, detached houses were predominated among the residents, and flats/apartments were the most common type of housing in the Green Park area, while terraced houses were prefered in Southberg area. Flats/apartments accounted for 76% among the population of Green Park area, significantly higher than the Central area which was represented of 76% and 25% in Southberg area. By contrast, the Southberg area made up the highest proportion for terraced houses, while the Central area and the Green Park area recorded at 18% and 14% respectively. There was 28% of the population in the Central area living in semi-detached houses, whereas the two remaining areas were just 5%. Similar to semi-detached houses, detached houses also recorded the highest type of accommodation with 39%, compared to the percentage in Green park area was merely 5% and Southberg area was 14%.
รายละเอียดตัวอย่าง
The table below shows the percentage of the population and the types of houses they live in in three areas of a city. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. The table below shows the percentage of the population and the types of houses they live in in three areas of a city. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
18/07/2026 11:02 5.5 คะแนน
หัวข้อ
The table below shows the percentage of the population and the types of houses they live in in three areas of a city. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. The table below shows the percentage of the population and the types of houses they live in in three areas of a city. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
จำนวนคำ: 164
แผนภูมิ/กราฟ

Essay
คะแนนรวม
5.5±0.5
พื้นฐาน
คะแนนเกณฑ์การเขียน
TA6.0
CC6.0
LR5.0
GRA6.0
Task Achievement6.0
เป้าหมาย: 7.0
ข้อผิดพลาด:0
Coherence & Cohesion6.0
เป้าหมาย: 7.0
ข้อผิดพลาด:1
Lexical Resource5.0
เป้าหมาย: 7.0
ข้อผิดพลาด:3
Grammar & Accuracy6.0
เป้าหมาย: 7.0
ข้อผิดพลาด:0
คลิกข้อความที่ไฮไลต์ในเรียงความเพื่อดูคำแนะนำรายละเอียดเพื่อพัฒนา
การวิเคราะห์เชิงลึก
Task 1 - Academic Writing
4 tools available
บทความตัวอย่าง - IELTS Writing Task 1
ยังไม่มีบทความตัวอย่าง
กดปุ่มด้านล่างเพื่อวิเคราะห์และสร้างบทความตัวอย่างคุณภาพสูงสำหรับ Task 1
