Sample Detail

Air pollution is created as a part of traffic congestion, so it has become a serious issue in many countries. To solve the problems, many opinions think that promoting residents in the city is the best solution than living in the countryside. While cities bring many convenient traffic, suburban areas can reduce overpopulation. In my opinion, I partly agree with this view.

On the one hand, living in the city allows residents to use public transportation. Metro systems, public vehicles can be used to limit private vehicles. This way can contribute to reducing traffic congestion in the crowded cities. Moreover, it can also help decline pollution issues and emissions. Most of the long-distance workforce especially can save travel time and easily access many jobs. Because they do not need to move from the suburbs to work. In addition, the centre city usually has more opportunities than the countryside. However, if more people move into cities, urban areas may become overcrowded. This can lead to heavier traffic, and pressure on public services.On the other hand, suburban areas are far from the city center, so people need longer moving time. Traveling would be inconvenient if there are traffic problems.＋ However, living in the countryside reduces city crowding and also reduces environmental problems. This way can help areas develop when populations create economic growth. Health’s people can be boosted by peaceful spaces where there is not more air pollution.

In conclusion, although living in cities many help improve transportation, it should be combined with better public transport and balanced regional development rather than being considered the best way.