Detail Sampel

＋It is often argued that art is possibly created by anyone. However, others hold the opposite belief that only genius who have special talents regarding artistry can be able to create art. Although both sides represent compelling arguments, I lean toward the first opinion.

Proponents of the first view claim that the rapid proliferation of technology paves the way for the freedom of art creation. Nowadays artificial intelligence is commonly used as an irreplaceable tool supporting human well-being and its operation depends heavily on complicated algorithms. This system allows individuals to create their artworks effortlessly in a few seconds. As a result, everyone can create their masterpiece and express their creativity. Moreover, a variety of tutorial videos and reels have mushroomed on many social platforms, thereby enabling people to access the artistic training without financial or geographical constraints. Hence, people can easily foster their interest in art and create any artworks by themselves anywhere and anytime. However, supporters of the second perspective argue that art is truly valuable when it is created from talented artists who hold some aptitudes that no one can imitate. For example, a poet cannot write down steps when making a poem because a moving poem was created by personal immediate emotions that suddenly inspired writers. Therefore, art is considered a form of emotional expression that offers artistic sensitivity and is only suitable for certain individuals who have special talents that can create precious, meaningful and significant masterpieces without other support or help. Although anyone can learn artistic techniques, producing truly original masterpieces requires exceptional creativity and emotional depth that cannot easily be acquired.

＋In conclusion, although both sides offer certain merits, I am convinced that the first opinion that everyone can create art holds more validity in the long run.