Sample Detail

It is thought that wealthy nations should donate other effective kinds of help to the developing countries instead of finances to address poverty. I totally agree with this perspective. This essay will explain my perspective and give alternatives.

The reason why I believe it is waste for developed countries to invest is that these finances cannot be given to receivers. This is because when receiving funding from rich countries, some corrupt government officials may misuse the funding for their profits rather than giving to underprivileged residents. Therefore, disadvantaged families might not earn the donation to make ends meet, leading to living in deprivation and poverty cycle. Consequently, giving money is not an effective way to solve the poverty in the developing nations

However, rather than allocating funding to poor countries to alleviate poverty, there are a number of poor-quality fields needing addressing. The reason is that the disadvantaged countries are facing problems related to education and employment: illiterate children and unskilled workers that may not contribute to economy development, hindering the long-term development. Hence, the rich nations prioritize the education, particularly in building more schools and training skilled teachers to improve education. In addition, they also provide a wide range of jobs and training programs for unemployed individuals; employees then are equipped with job-related skills and practical experience. As a result, students and workers can enhance their quality of life, contributing and promoting economy development.

In conclusion, I strongly agree that investing more funding in poor countries to solve poverty is not a practical way due to the corruption of the government officials. Instead, wealthy nations should construct schools and train skilled teachers to education, and provide jobs and programs for workers so that they may escape poverty.