Detail Sampel

＋Evironment problems increase these days which include deforestation, climate change, global warming… and many people argue that international cooperation is required to solve these impacts rather than independent governments. While I agree with taking responsibility for environment depends on each country, I am of the opinion that we should make contact via the world.

Tackling individually is beneficial to some extent. One major reason is that distinctive issues depend on domestic country. This is due to the fact that it does not share identical pattern like weather conditions, landscapes, seasons… Therefore, we need appropriate solutions for each concept. For example, while Vietnam takes concerntration in floods and hurricanes, some European and Latin American regions notice with melting glacier so it is compulsory to have local governments who know clearly the area to control the risks that we may face. As a result, this might positively affect in environmental changes, even overtime we can minimize serious damage.＋Apart from the pratical advantages expressed above, I still believe that global organization is much better than national governments. This is because governments may struggle to deal with environmental concern independently. To be more specific, negative effects merely appear in one area, it can widely spread the surrounding area. Therefore, cooperation is essential to stay updated with current events. For instance, hurricanes are navigated direction easily to the other country by wind, at that time we need emergency methods by connecting global organization. Consequently, thanks to mutual support, people will decrease catastrophes’ destruction and in the long-term we can promote and preserve a better world toghether.

＋In conclusion, for the reasons I have mentioned above, I strongly believe that instead of handling alone, we need a global collaboration to aim with changing environmental factors.