Sample Detail

＋Some people believe that harsher regulations on fast food should be implemented by governments to promote better health among individuals. I partly agree with this view as enforcing stricter laws on convenience food can bring some benefits but not the superior solution.

To begin with, imposing stricter laws on fast food can contribute to some benefits of public health. When goverments implement harsher laws on convenience food such as increasing the cost, many consumers can be discourage to buy that stuff as it is no longer worth the price. As a result, the obesity rate might be mitigate because individuals are likely to limit the consumption of fast food if it does not bring the benefits that are equivalent to the price they pay.＋ Reduction in obedient people means that the better in public health. Nonetheless, this measure cannot take effect in every situations since citizens can still acquire obedient and many other health problem because of overly consuming sweetened drink or unhygienic food.

To promote a better health in society, government ought to emphasis on educating and raising people awareness about the affects of fast food. By opening workshops or educational campaigns about health problems, the public can acknowledge the negative effect of obesity that excessive consumption of convenience food and sweetened drink bring about. Knowing the impacts of unhealthy foods, individuals tend to reduce the amount of fast food that they consume and adopt a healthier eating habits.

In conclusion, while imposing stricter laws on unhealthy food can discourage the consumption of individuals, educating the public may be the better measure as it can assist people understand the impacts that fast food bring to their body.