Detail Sampel

It is without a doubt that many individuals who have reached adolescence and have financial freedom are still occupying their parents homes. In this essay, I will demonstrate why this is a negative phenomenon.

We can not overlook that this trend may bring many positive outcomes. First and foremost, many young adults can accumulate financial reserves. By continuing to live with their parents, they can skip on rental fees and monthly expenses. As a result, they can save up more money for future investments such as buying a house or starting up a company. Another pro worthy of mentioning is that young people who are all grown up could help their parents with household chores. For example, they can help with tasks that are merely impossible for the elders. Therefore reducing physical pressure on their parents.However , the negatives that such a trend would bring outweigh the aforementioned positives. The first reason why this phenomenon is bad , is that it would postpone the development of self-responsibility for many young adults. For example cooking, household chores and paying monthly bills. If the parents of such individuals keep taking over such simple tasks, young people can miss the opportunity to develop soft-skills and survival habits. The aftermath is that these young adults cannot live independently in the near future. Another factor to put in mind is that there is less privacy for those who live with their parents. It is true that when young people grow up, ironically they would want to hangout with their friends, develop personal relationships or spend a few nights away from home without needing to get permission. That is why living with one’s parents would deter them from committing to such activities.＋

In conclusion, for individuals who have reached adolescence to live with their may bring many positive outcomes that are backed by family privilege. However, such a phenomenon may bring many negatives.