Nowadays, since high quality school and medical facilities are mostly avaliable only in the cities, some people agure that they should implement some requirement for new teachers or doctors to work in rural areas for some years. However, I believe that they have a right to choose their working areas.
Detail Sampel
In many countries, good schools and medical facilities are available only in cities. Some people think new teachers and doctors should be required to work in rural areas for a few years, but others think everyone should be free to choose where they work. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Topik
In many countries, good schools and medical facilities are available only in cities. Some people think new teachers and doctors should be required to work in rural areas for a few years, but others think everyone should be free to choose where they work. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Introduction
Body
Granted, allocating this workforce to the countryside is beneficial for the local and general development. When all the residents have a chance to access to advance facilities or education, it not only improves their life quality but also creates a development throughout the nation. In fact, some young in the rural areas lack of basic literacy skill or have to suffer from several illness, caused by the poor exposure to education or urgent treatments. In addition, if all this workforces are mainly allocated in the cities, it both creates a more competitive market and might trigger a surge in unemployment rate. However, it can just only bring short-term benefit since they can still return to the cities where provides them with more promotion opportunities after few years of the requirement.
Solely provding these workforce to the countryside might not create any significant improvement. In fact, having a number of workforce but without enough or suitable facilities can lead to further obstacle for this employees while still can not provide any significant changes. In addition, requiring them to work in the rural also create an unequal society. To having the qualification to be able to work in this field, they have gone over several years of training and learning, therefore they are deserved the chance to develop their career trajectories. Working in the countryside not only limits their job opportunities, but also prevents them to expose to advance facilities or profressional training.+
Conclusion
In conclusion, while promoting these workforce to the rural can help local people have access to better education or medical facilities, it might be an unequal to the people working in this career due to the limitation of job opportunities there. As a result, working in the countryside should only be a voluntary choice instead of a requirement.
Skor Keseluruhan
Cukup
Skor Kriteria Writing
Klik teks yang ditandai di esai untuk melihat saran detail untuk peningkatan.
Analisis mendalam
Task 2 - Essay Writing
Task 2 - Esai contoh
Esai contoh skor tinggi dengan analisis struktur untuk topik yang diberikan.
Belum ada esai contoh
Silakan klik tombol di bawah untuk menganalisis dan membuat esai contoh berkualitas tinggi untuk topik Anda.
