Sample Detail

Nowadays, an increasing number of citizens are concerned about the promotion of public health. While I agree with the idea that gonvernment should impose stricter regulations on fast food, I believe that it has many benefits.

On the one hand, I agree that presidents need to impose regulations harder on unhealthy food to improve society's health for two main reasons. Firstly, the argument is the drawbacks of eating unhealthy food. Many fast food brands used dirty ingredients to make food because they want to save money and time. For instance, the large number of junk food shops have been band for 6 months to 3 years depend on the effects of unhealthy ingreadients. Secondly, another factor is the effects of diabetes. Fast food have a serious impact of human' health. However, individuals do not stop consuming junk food so the proportion of diabetes is increasing. As a result, fast food plays a key role in the rise of obesity and leads to many health problems.

On the other hand, I believe that gonvernments should raise the public's awareness of consuming unhealthy food to develop citizen's health for a couple of reasons. The first cause is that the presidents should give priority to increase the tax of fast food. High prices play a critical role in helping individuals avoid junk food. Therefore, the number of patients suffer from diabtes are decrease. The second indicator is the improvement of junk food ingreadients. The gonvernments need to cut down on the number of unhealth food to protect public health. To illustrate, presidents should invest in fast food industry and pay attention to the quality of ingredients. As a result, gonvernments should be responsible for human's health and tackle the problem of unhealthy food.

In concusion, although eating fast food has some advantages, I belive that presidents need to impose stricter regulations on junk food to improve citizen's health.