Sample Detail

＋There is an ongoing debate that authorities should allocate monetary sources on arts. While this trend can enhance a country’s arts capacity and global standing, I argue that health and education reserve higher financial investment to improve citizens’ well-being and civilization.

Admittedly, arts can assist nations in gaining international recognition. To be more specific, artistic field nurtures creativity, empathy and self-expression of individuals, helping them get high ranks in international art competitions. For example, Italy, which has focused on investing monetary source in arts, is famous for gifted artists obtaining Nobel prizes in arts. Therefore, nations which consistently pour money in artistic aspect may enhance their arts capacity and global standing. Conversely, it is also pervasively suggested that governments should prioritise their expenditure on health and education. More precisely, health should be financially focused in order that everyone in society have equal access to healthcare systems, curing them from chronic and cardiovascular diseases. In addition, higher spending of authorities budget in education can improve social mobility, ensuring individuals from different backgrounds having opportunities to going schools. More specific, prioritising government budget on education can level the playing fields for students from disadvantaged background, cultivating talented and civilized individuals for nations.＋

＋In conclusion, it is widely tendency that governments have a preference to spend money on arts, I remain that health and education should be financially prioritised due to general well-being and general civilization.