Detail Sampel

＋Many people strongly believe that successful sports professionals can earn much more money than other crucial professionals. It is, however, also claimed that this statement is unfair. Both sides have, of course, their own merits, but I think the second view is more reasonable.

On the one hand, some people think that successful sport professionals’ salaries should be taken precedence over other essential professionals. This is mainly because some successful professionals can bring a lot of prize for a nation, and propel a country to fame. These things help a country to stimulate the economic growth by boosting tourist arrivals. Moreover, a substantial salary can be a motivation for athletes trying their best to get achievements, this can boost a nation’s sport industry. However, it cannot be denied that this approach could lead to a shortage of workers in other vital professions because of the inadequate remuneration. On the other hand, other people believe that other vital professionals can also a fair level of remuneration. This approach promote a social justice because all professionals should be treated equally. If only successful sports professionals can earn a substantial salary, other vital professionals will feel that their salaries are inadequate so this may lead to a shortage of vital professionals in other fields. Furthermore, a fair level of remuneration can also ensure a balanced distribution of workers across different sectors. If only successful sport professionals can earn a high salary, more people will choose to pursue careers in sport industry and the vital roles played by other professionals will plummet as consequence of a inadequate remuneration.＋

＋In conclusion, both of arguments are justifiable to a certain extent, I firmly support the view that all professionals should be treated fairly.