Detail Sampel

In many societies, the debate surrounding the ideal age for leadership roles in organisations has gained considerable attention. It is argued that the top positions of organisations are often held by older people, while others believe that the younger cohort is more suitable for the leadership. From my perspective, I firmly believe that younger people should be at the helm because of their adaptability to some financial setbacks and their creativity to generate valuable ideas.

First and foremost, those proponents who advocate for the youth being leaders have some valid arguments. In the modern age, with the evolution of high-tech devices, young people are highly promising leaders since they are better at getting exposed to these kinds of technologies. To illustrate, the youth can monitor the up-to-date machines or maximize the utilization of artificial intelligence more effectively than the eldely. Thus, corporations can benefit from their expertise and this is highly likely to enhance the productivity of the organisations.

Another merit highlights the flexibility of young leaders, especially when working in different positions. They can flexibly take charge of various types of work and cope with unforeseeable adversities.＋ Ultimately, younger individuals often devise more creative ideas than the older ones. This may therefore facilitate companies to develop more products with innovative breakthroughs that not only enables them to gain enormous revenue but also reputation. All of these reasons have demonstrated that the leadership should be given to the youth.

To sum up, I contend that young people are more suited to the highest positions of companies, in terms of their intensive exposure to modern technology and their versatility in most situations.