範文詳情

It is widely argued that governments should spend money on measures to save languages with only few speakers. Whilefew speakers, while some believe that it is a waste of financial resources. ＋I firmly agree with this view to a large extent. This essay will explain the main reason for my position.

The first justification is that governments have limited budgets that should be spent on essential public services. In other words, government financials is needed for such as healthcare, transportations, and education .For example, spending money on important public services instead of language, improving infrastructure of the country. In contrast, using funding governments to preserve language can cause budget deficit, because only have fewer speakers so it is a small benefit to bring to society.

Admittedly, opponents may claim that saving languages with few speakers can help people have more opportunities to get a job. Nowadays, English and Chinese are popular, having certificate can help you develop professional skills.＋ However, this argument is unsuccessful, since people spend their personal finances. In addition, reducing amount of money and increase number of speakers. Therefore, despite opposing view, I still believe that governments should spend on important things to service everyone.

＋In conclusion, although there is some truth in the argument that helping people have a chance to get a better job.job, I strongly believe that local authorities should spend money on essential public services. This is mainly because servicingit serves the people and upgradingupgrades the infrastructure.