Sample Detail

It has been argued that high-school students should be forced to take part in unpaid community service. Personally, I tend to disagree with this view.＋

It is ture that community service can have benificial effects on teenagers. First of all, teenagers can improve a wide range of skills. More specifically, if they work for a charity and assit a donation, they need to find new donors and try to persuade them. If they teach sports to children, they would explain rules and lead them to play games. All of these can help them to develop soft skills in terms of leadership and communication. In addition, teenagers could gain good moral values if they take part in community service. For example, teenagers can develop a sense of social responsbility by helping others. These moral values that they learned will be along with them in formative years.However, community service should not be compulsory in high-school. Firstly, community service is an added burden for high-school students. To be specific, high-school students are under great stress with academic studies. Doing community service could reduce their time for relaxation. It will affect their grade if they have no enough time for recovering. Specially students who are busy on applying university would lack of time to sleep. Moreover, Teenagers are rebelious. More specifically, they will have negative emotions, if they are forced to do anything. They are not ready to devote themseleves into community service. It could lead them have bad attitudes about doing community service in many years, if school force them to do it.

In conclusion, while force high-school students to join unpaid community service can make them improve skills better and gain positive values, the negative effects should not be ignored.