नमूना विवरण

The convergence of social development and healthy lifestyle promotion has highlighted concerns over the quality and nutritional values of food. Opinions are divided as to whether the government should provide subsidies for food or heavy tax should implemented on unhealthy food. This essay will first discuss both side before giving out subjective opinion.

To commence with, the idea of the government providing financial support for food holds merit. This is because a lot of people, especially homeless or poor ones, struggle to make ends meet and afford high-quality food.＋ Their meals, therefore, do not ensure sufficient nutritional intakes and high hygiene. If the government intervene in this problem by offering more fruits and vegetable, healthy food can gradually become cheaper and available for citizens with ingredients supported.

On the other hand, people that agree on tax implementation also have equittable reasoning. Specifically, a myriad of corporation and businesses now just concentrate on attracting their customers and improving revenue. As a result, they try to make the prices of their products cheaper for market competency, yet these products are usually not clear in origin labelling or safety certifications. Consumers, nevertheless, hardly recognize such abnomals and consume these products, leading to themselves facing a lot of health problems. Therefore, when the government apply tax policies on such unhealthy food, they can partially prevent consumers from consuming them owing to higher prices.＋

＋To conclude, two suggested ways contribute to making food market more transparent and healthy food more available to people, so I fully agree with both of them.