Sample Detail

There is a debate about whether the progress in economic does more harm than good. Whilst, the are some individuals opine that it goes along way towards easing worldwide food and financial issues, the others argue that it could promt concern about the ecosystem. This essay would delve into discussing the two perspectives as well as stating my support for the former one.

In terms of environment, economic progress is one of the main root causes of environmental degradation. By the expansion of factories, industrial farms, a lot of trees were cut down to make way for those development. As a result, natural disaster or extreme weather happends more and more gradually and unpredictedly. For instance, there was an era when China’s economic recorded a miracle growth in the period of 70s. Inevitiably, with the explode of industrial factories, a lot ofs toxic emmisions were released. Consequencely, It has turned Peking become the most polluted city in the world.

Regarding the advancement in economic, there are many appealing reasons why people think it is crucial. Firstly, by the growth of economic, the gorvenment can gain a great amount of money, which could be used to subsidize social welfare programs and national food security. Thereby, these improvements bridge the socio-economic disparity and significantly support low-income dwellers. Provided that, these progress be accopanied with environmental protection measures like using renewable energy, sustainable produce and so forth, it would offer plenty of merits and outweigh its demerits.

In conclusion, although it could be disastrous if economic advancement happends without any environmental supervisors, the advantage it provide is much more significant.